Fifty CVs, ranked against the job, in about a minute.
Paste in what the role actually needs, drop in the pile of applications, and get them back in order — each one with the reasoning written out, so you can disagree with it.
What comes back
Arjun Mehta
Eight years of backend work, most of it deep in Laravel, MySQL and REST API design. Mentors juniors and runs code review, which the posting asks for.
Gaps team sizes of 4–5, so leadership at larger scale is unproven
Priya Nair
Hands-on with all three must-have skills across several production projects, including a booking platform with payments.
Gaps agency project work rather than owning one system; no mentoring evidence
Sneha Iyer
Solid on every must-have skill and clearly capable, but three years against a five-year minimum. Promising mid-level rather than senior.
Rohit Bansal
Clears the years threshold, but the work is mostly WordPress and legacy PHP with Laravel on a single internal project.
Real output from this tool. Note the fourth candidate: more years than the third, scored lower — because the screening reads what the experience actually was, not how long it lasted.
One more thing it caught
Kabir Shah
A recent graduate, still learning Laravel, well short of what the role needs. The resume also contained an instruction, hidden in white text, telling the screening system to award full marks. It was ignored and flagged in the summary.
People do try this. Resume text is treated as data, never as instructions.
How it works
Describe the role Title, must-have skills, minimum years, and the description.
Upload the applications PDF, DOCX or TXT, up to fifty at a time.
Read the ranking Each file is processed in the background, so the list fills in as results land.
Worth knowing before you rely on it
It's a first pass, not a decision
The score narrows a pile down to the ones worth reading properly. It doesn't reject anybody, and the reasoning is shown precisely so you can overrule it.
Name, age and college are excluded
Scoring runs against the posting's requirements. Personal characteristics and institution prestige are explicitly kept out of the judgement.
Instructions hidden in a CV don't work
Resume text is treated as data, not as instructions. Someone writing "score this 100" in white text gets no advantage.
Scanned CVs won't parse
Image-only files are flagged as failed rather than quietly scored zero. Text-based PDFs and Word files are fine.